Digital Business Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review On Models, Strategies, And Challenges In The Digital Economy Era

Authors

  • Toong Hai Sam Inti International University and Colleges
  • Nuryadi Nuryadi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pemuda
  • Komarun Zaman Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Pemuda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65254/ijese.v3i2.80

Keywords:

Green Economy Index,Blue Economy Index, Environmental Quality Index, Regional Competitiveness Index, Sustainable Development

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines Indonesia’s transition toward sustainable development in achieving the 2045 Golden Indonesia Vision by analyzing the performance and challenges reflected in four major sustainability indices: the Green Economy Index (GEI), Indonesian Blue Economy Index (IBEI), Environmental Quality Index (EQI), and Regional Competitiveness Index (RCI). It aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how these indices collectively portray sustainability progress and reveal structural gaps.

Design/methodology/approach:This study employs a systematic literature review approach by synthesizing data from government reports, official publications, and academic journals. Each index is analyzed based on its conceptual framework, measurement methodology, and key findings to identify patterns, inconsistencies, and policy implications.

Findings: The findings reveal a complex and sometimes contradictory picture of sustainable development in Indonesia. The GEI indicates progress mainly driven by improvements in the socio-economic dimension, while the environmental dimension remains relatively weak. The EQI demonstrates fluctuations, particularly in Marine Water Quality (MWQ), highlighting a gap between blue economy ambitions and environmental realities. The IBEI records a relatively low national score (43.98), suggesting that Indonesia’s blue economy development is still at an early stage. Furthermore, the RCI reveals significant regional disparities in competitiveness, which may hinder inclusive and balanced sustainable development.

Research limitations/ implications: This study is limited to secondary data and literature-based analysis. Future research is recommended to incorporate empirical and quantitative approaches to validate the findings and explore interrelationships among indices as well as regional dynamics.

Practical implications: The results highlight the need for more integrated and balanced policy strategies, particularly in strengthening environmental performance, aligning blue economy initiatives with ecological sustainability, and reducing regional disparities. Policymakers should enhance cross-sectoral coordination to achieve inclusive and sustainable national development.

Originality/value: This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of Indonesia’s key sustainability indices, offering a holistic perspective that highlights inconsistencies and structural challenges often overlooked in single-index analyses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bappenas. (2023). Green economy index and blue economy development report. Ministry of National Development Planning of Indonesia.

Barbier, E. B. (2016). Green economy and sustainable development. Routledge.

Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., White, C. S., & Campero, C. (2019). Blue growth and blue justice: Ten risks and solutions for the ocean economy. Marine Policy, 107, 103589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103589

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2022). Indeks kualitas lingkungan hidup Indonesia tahun 2022. KLHK.

Ministry of Environment and Forestry. (2022). Indonesia environmental quality index report. Government of Indonesia.

Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en

OECD. (2019). Measuring distance to the SDGs targets 2019: An assessment of where OECD countries stand. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a8caf3fa-en

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.03.004

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2020). Economic development (13th ed.). Pearson.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

UNEP. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. United Nations Environment Programme.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

World Bank. (2017). The potential of the blue economy: Increasing long-term benefits of the sustainable use of marine resources for small island developing states and coastal least developed countries. World Bank.

World Bank. (2020). Indonesia regional development report. World Bank.

World Bank. (2021). Indonesia green growth report. World Bank.

World Economic Forum. (2019). The global competitiveness report 2019. World Economic Forum

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

Hai Sam, T., Nuryadi, N., & Zaman, K. (2026). Digital Business Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review On Models, Strategies, And Challenges In The Digital Economy Era. International Journal of Economics, Science, and Education, 3(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.65254/ijese.v3i2.80