Determinants Of Organizational Performance: A Systematic Review Of Management Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65254/ijese.v2i6.56Keywords:
Organizational performance, Management studies, Determinants, Systematic literature review, Dynamic capabilitiesAbstract
Purpose:Organizational performance has become a central issue in management research due to increasing environmental complexity and competitive pressures. This study aims to systematically review and synthesize the determinants of organizational performance identified in management studies, providing an integrated understanding of key influencing factors and research trends.
Design/methodology/approach:This study employs a systematic literature review by analyzing peer-reviewed journal articles indexed in reputable databases. The review follows PRISMA guidelines with clearly defined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure methodological rigor.
Findings:The results indicate that organizational performance is primarily influenced by human resource factors, leadership, strategic capabilities, innovation, and governance mechanisms. Dynamic capabilities and employee-related variables emerge as dominant determinants across studies.
Research limitations/implications:This review is limited to selected databases and publication periods, which may restrict the generalizability of findings.
Practical implications:Managers can use these findings to prioritize strategic and human resource initiatives to enhance organizational performance.
Originality/value:This study provides an integrative synthesis of organizational performance determinants and proposes future research directions.
Paper type: Literature review
Downloads
References
Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.32465722.
Arifin, S., Setyowati, L., Zaman, K., & Anisa, N. A. (2024). Administrative Procedures For Management And Security Of Inventory Of Goods. International Journal of Economics, Science, and Education, 1(1), 1–8.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Sage Publications.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672. https://doi.org/10.5465/256741
Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta‐analytic investigation. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264–1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Pratama, D. P. A., & Arifin, S. (2024). Increase Service Sales Turnover Through A Digital Marketing Approach: Effective? International Journal of Global Accounting, Management, Education, and Entrepreneurship, 4(2), 231–237.
Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330560
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.C.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283976.
Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (2001). Exploring human capital: Putting “human” back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(4), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20045.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Achmad Efendi, Agus Sanjaya, Siti Masruroh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
